Voltaire (1694-1778): “Doctors pour drugs of which they know little, to cure diseases of which they know less, into human beings of whom they know nothing.”
These questions have been prepared to help all those who, for whatever reason, are in no hurry to undergo forced vaccination at the request of a boss or a government official.
Name, Last Name
Date of this letter
Person the letter is being addressed to
Name of Business
Address, email, phone number
Re: SARS-Co V-2 Vaccination Exemption Letter of INSERT YOUR NAME
Dear NAME OF THE PERSON YOU ARE ADDRESSING YOUR LETTER:
I have received a letter informing me that I must undergo force SARS-Co V-2 drug vaccination to maintain my job at NAME OF THE BUSINESS. I am requesting exemption from being required to receive any of the current EUA experimental SARS-Co V-2 drug vaccines. In the event these experimental drugs receive DFA approval, this letter serves the purpose of requesting exemption from any such drug vaccine biologic agent.
I am writing this letter based upon my U.S. Constitutional rights and rights established under the Amendments to the Constitution; my religious and/or personal beliefs; my rights as a citizen of California; my unalienable rights stated under the Declaration of Independence; my medical concerns; legal precedent established by the SCOTUS; and the Oath of Office (Article II, § 1, Clause 8, 5 U.S. Code § 3331) taken by elected and appointed officials in compliance with their obligations to “… support and defend the Constitution of the United States…” including their obligations under Article VI, paragraph 2.
Insert your age, medical history, medications and reason for your concern of a medical problem from being injected with these drug vaccine biologics. The listing of this information does not entitle you to make my personal health information available to others and doing so will be considered by myself to be a violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).
Given the current data showing the ever increasing InflamoThrobmotic Response (ITR) and prion diseases, with resulting disease and mortality associated with each of the three current Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Experimental Drug Vaccines Biologics, and after reviewing the published EUA data on SARS-Co V-2 and COVID-19 on ww.FlemingMethod.com including the specific calculated absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 0.8-1.25% associated with these experimental drug vaccines biologics – an ARR that is NOT statistically significant – I do not believe it is in my best interest to be required to undergo the risk associated with such a vaccination.
Given the absence of positive outcome date -specifically untreatable COVID-19 or death and the currently increasing incidence of adverse event reported to VAERS, there is simply no scientific or medical justification for your requiring me to undergo force vaccination with any of these drug vaccine biologics. In particular I am concerned with my risk of experiencing an adverse event given my medical and medication history, as well as the breach of my religious and/r personal believes, in addition to my Constitutional and unalienable rights. Adverse events, that should they occur following a force biologic vaccination, would place (my immediate supervisor/my boss) and (my place of business) under increased liability for having required such a forced drug biologic vaccination.
In addition to this increased liability is the legal question under both the 9th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Under these amendments, the Federal Government and the Sates respectively cannot infringe upon personal liberty rights and the due process rights granted under these amendments. The SCOTUS has ruled that U.S. Citizens have certain fundamental rights guaranteed to them in the area of sex, health care and family.
In Rochin v. California (1952) the SCOTUS held that people may NOT have procedures forced upon them. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) the SCOTUS held that any infringement of those rights would require legislative statute with “compelling and substantial” reasons. In Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Medicine (1990), the SCOTUS held that patients have the RIGHT to refuse medical care and that forced care constitutes ASSAULT. In Doe v. Rumsfeld (2004) the SCOTUS held that investigational drugs CANNOT be given absent informed consent or Presidential waiver. Such a waiver by the President would demonstrate a flagrant violation of Article VI, paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution and a violation of the Oath of Office (Article II, § 1, Clause 8; 5 U.S. Code § 3331). Such a violation would be by definition, an act of Treason.
As these drug vaccines are both experimental and require informed consent under both the 1947 Nuremberg Code and the 1967 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, failure to obtain uncoerced voluntary informed consent is a violation of U.S. Treaty Law. Under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the U.S. Constitution, Treaties are the Supreme Law of the Land. Failure to follow Treaty Law is a violation of the U.S. Constitution and as such is illegal. Any individual who takes the Oath of the Office as stated n Article II, Section I, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution (not limited to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government) and then violates Treaty Law is by definition guilty of Treason; a crime that is punishable by death. This Oath as already stated above was further codified by statute to incorporate all individuals taking the Oath.
Under Amendment I of the U.S. Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
As a U.S. Citizen I am declaring that the taking of these drug vaccine biologics, that by the FDA, HHS, and FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) have stated are gene therapy, violates my religious beliefs and that you may NOT force me to take these drug vaccine biologics or threaten me with the loss of employment at my current work place. Such an action is a violation of my rights under the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution.
Finally, this exemption letter asks for nothing more than would be granted a Federal Prisoner under the November 2021 Revised Inmate Information Handbook Federal Bureau of Prisons. Pursuant to a Prisoner’s Health Care Rights, page 50, I noted the following:
16. You have the right to be involved n all aspects of the decision-making process regarding your medical/mental health care. Every effort will be made to honor your beliefs and expectation regarding the care provided.
17. You have the right to expect that your medical/mental health information will only be shared with individuals involved in your care as limited by state and federal laws. You may share your information with whomever you choose.
18. You have the right to receive care in a safe environment and to be free from neglect, exploitation, and all forms of abuse to include sexual, physical, mental, and verbal.
19. You have the right to refuse any experimental research, or educational activities that may be involved in your treatment plan without fear of reprisal.
Certainly, if Federal prisoners are afforded these rights, I should be afforded the same Health Care rights.
Given my medical, legal and religious objections to taking these SARS-Co V-2 drug vaccine biologics as stated above, and given the U.S. Constitutional rights as affirmed by the SCOTUS; I am hereby officially requesting exemption from the forced coercive drug vaccine biologics and look forward to hearing back from you forthwith approving my exemption from these drug vaccine biologics.
Please return the approved exemption forthwith via email to me at YOUR EMAIL. Should you fail to approve my exemption please submit medical, legal, religious and U.S. Constitutional and SCOTUS ruling your decision forthwith to YOUR EMAIL.
I trust you will affirm my medical, legal, religious and Constitutional rights.
Name, Last Name